Did a camera opening assist the Red Wings in their comeback? The Detroit News photographer's role in a lucky goal sparks debate.
On January 29, 2026, the Detroit Red Wings faced the Washington Capitals in a thrilling NHL game. With the score tied at 3-3 and less than a minute left in the third period, Red Wings forward Alex DeBrincat's wrist shot took a bizarre turn. It ricocheted off a camera opening, where Detroit News photographer Dave Guralnick had been capturing photos for nearly three decades, and found its way into the net.
The goal, deemed a "lucky bounce" by DeBrincat, tied the game and earned the Red Wings a crucial point in the standings. However, the play sparked intense discussion on social media, with some questioning whether Guralnick's camera opening played a role in the unexpected turn of events.
ESPN+ color analyst and former NHL defenseman Erik Johnson described it as a "nothing play," suggesting that the puck's path was highly unusual. Capitals coach Spencer Carbery called it an "obscure goal," admitting he had never seen anything like it before. He explained that the camera opening, usually covered with plexiglass, was partially open, allowing the puck to hit the camera and then explode into the net.
Red Wings coach Todd McLellan found the goal reminiscent of the Joe Louis Arena's boards, which sometimes worked in their favor. Despite the controversial nature of the goal, DeBrincat remained focused on the positive outcome, stating they were "lucky to get one point."
The incident raises intriguing questions about the boundaries of sports fairness and the role of equipment in game outcomes. Did the camera opening contribute to the goal, or was it simply a matter of luck? The debate continues, leaving fans and analysts alike to ponder the impact of seemingly minor factors in the world of professional sports.
